Managing Organizational Culture for Improved Performance Essay

Managing Organizational Culture for Improved Performance - Essay Example 93) indicates that organisational culture has been described as a set of norms, beliefs, principles and ways of behaving that gives organisations a distinctive character. This is the same definition that many writers have used and so there is a general understanding of what it means. Norms are established patterns of behaviour which most writers agree to. 1.3 Culture Management Culture management refers to the refreshment of the existing culture within an organisation or the change of a culture that has become obsolete (Grigoruta et al 2005). 2.0 Culture and organisational performance According to Deal and Kennedy (2000) every business has a culture.’ However, sometimes it is reduced to bits and pieces and is therefore difficult to read from the outside. Some employees are loyal to their bosses while some are loyal to the union and still there are others who only care about their fellow employees. Even though there are those who only work because they need money there are time s when the culture of an organisation is strong and cohesive with everyone having knowledge of the goals and therefore working towards it. Deal and Kennedy (2000) further points out that culture has a very powerful influence whether it is weak or strong. It affects almost everything including who gets promoted, how employees dress and the spots they play. This impact suggests that ‘culture has a major impact on the success of the business.’ Deal and Kennedy (2000) provides examples of early leaders of American businesses including Harley Procter of Procter & Gamble and Thomas Watson of IBM who believed that strong culture played a role in the success of their organisations. These leaders believed that the organisation in which persons were employed helped to shape their lives and productivity. They saw their role as creating an environment which was effectively a culture within their organisations; one in which employees felt secure and thereby carry out the work necess ary to make the organisation successful. They had no magical formula but through trial and error. The cultures that these leaders built and nourished have helped to sustain their organisations through very difficult times. The organisations that they led continue to be successful as they still have strong cultures and still continue to be leaders in their industry. What Deal and Kennedy (2000) suggests is that there is no formula – they just did it by trial and error which is much like trying something until it works. This cannot be a prescription for organisations that want to improve their performance and is far from the truth. It is clear that these leaders of whom Deal and Kennedy (2000) spoke used various means which resulted in highly motivated employees who were willing to go the extra mile to ensure that these organisations achieved there goals. Motivating people and letting them feel as if they are a very important part of the organisation is an important aspect of l eadership. It is the things that are done to motivate employees that have led to successful companies. Deal and Kennedy

Land Law terms and conditional Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Land Law terms and conditional - Essay Example The most common problems resulting from tenancy agreements border on landlord ignorance of tenant rights or problems of transfer as the one detailed in this case. This is a situation where a current owner sells the property to another, the major question being whether current tenants are bound by agreements made under the previous owner. Most times, the two forms of tenancy are referred to as either assured or shorthold tenancy. However, there are other forms of tenancy that result, not because they are assured or recognized by the law but because they fail to meet the provisions stated for these two forms of tenancy. A license to occupy A license to occupy is appropriate only for temporary arrangement; it is less detailed in comparison to a full lease. For this reason, it cannot be used in place of a full lease, or where the occupant is going to occupy property for a lengthy period of time. License to occupy is adaptable to diverse situations, and is frequently used when a tenant is only interested to occupy property momentarily or when the procedures of a lease are being concluded. Individuals wishing to occupy property for a temporary time can avoid such long term commitments by drafting a license to occupy, in which case rent is to be paid in the next week or month. If such obligations are not met, the License will come to an end. Under a License to occupy the Landlord has exclusive rights to property access at any time. Lease Agreement Unlike a license to occupy, a Commercial Lease Agreement is appropriate for letting property for a period not less than six moths and not beyond three years. The longer the lease period, the more detailed the lease agreement becomes. An agreement which is anything beyond three years requires a well detailed agreement which should be prepared and reviewed by a qualified solicitor. One major difference between leases and other forms of tenancy is that lease agreements accords exclusive rights of occupancy to the lease holder. The implication of this is that the landlord cannot access the property unless under any identified circumstances specified in the agreement. Exclusive rights to property also mean that the tenant reserves the right of the owner for the period of the lease, this means he can sub let, through a Sublease Agreement. Leasing is not common for residential property but is mostly embraced for commercial reasons. Lease forms a contractual obligation binding the property owner the lessee, however, it also creates an interest in property. For this reason, it must be issued for a definite period of time, but can extend beyond this period. In such a case, it becomes a Tenancy at Will which can be terminated through an adequate notice. Adequate time for the notice might be detailed in the lease agreement, however, if such is not included the notice period will equate to the frequency of payment of rent as indicated in the agreement. The main difference between a lease agreement and a License is that a lease conveys interest in land, something which a license does not. This was well indicated in a 1673 case, Thomas v Sorrell: In this case, it was passed that a license passes no interest, and does not alter or transfer property; all it does is make an act lawful which without the license had been unlawful. A similar, position was taken by Justice Macdonald in Baker v Gee, the Justice held; that according to the provisions of